The Conservative Future Turns 14

By Concerned Conservative on February 19, 2010

Jonathan Krohn has the nation talking. He’s not outrageous, demanding fame and attention. Rather he’s fourteen and an outspoken conservative. Last year Krohn was nationally heard in his 3 minute CPAC speech about grassroots conservatism. Now he’s about to release his second book.

Krohn’s idea of a conservative society includes constitutional regard, respect for life, less government and personal responsibility. Mike Gallagher, nationally syndicated radio host said of Krohn, “Any time I am depressed about the state of our country or the future of the modern conservative movement, I consider two words: Jonathan Krohn. If America’s future leadership includes this smart-as-a-whip phenom, we’re going to be just fine.”

The young Georgian has been recognized as gifted since about first grade when he took an IQ test with astounding results. In the very recent past, he has caught the attention of conservative leaders Newt Gingrich, Mike Gallagher, Jon Stewart, Ann Coulter, William Bennett, and Lisa De Pasquale among others.

Jonathan Krohn

Jonathan Krohn

When asked about his political future, Krohn said that he doesn’t intend to run for office, but is working on getting his own political radio talk show. Some are hopeful that his future will include a presidential campaign, calling for “Jonathan Krohn, 2032!”

Although Krohn won’t be able to even vote for at least four more years, we expect big things from him in the near and distant futures.

2010 Obama Spending

By Concerned Conservative on February 16, 2010

President Barack Obama has repeatedly claimed that his budget would cut the deficit by half by the end of his term. Given that Obama has already helped quadruple the deficit with his stimulus package, pledging to halve it by 2013 is hardly plausible.

Some may argue that George W. Bush is responsible for Barack Obama’s deficits, that Mr. Bush forced the hand of this administration by leaving office in the midst of a sharp recession.

This argument is absolutely incorrect. At some point the Obama administration has to take responsibility for itself.

Consider that from Jan. 20, 2001, to Jan. 20, 2009, the debt held by the public grew $3 trillion under President Bush—to $6.3 trillion from $3.3 trillion at a time when the national economy grew as well.

By comparison, from the day President Obama took office last year to the end of the current fiscal year, according to the Office of Management and Budget, the debt held by the public will grow by $3.3 trillion. In 20 months, Obama will add as much debt as Bush ran up in eight years.

Obama’s spending plan approved by Congress last February calls for doubling the national debt in five years and nearly tripling it in 10.

Democrats Ducking Out

By Concerned Conservative on February 12, 2010

Democrats are already starting to opt out. Elections aren’t until November, but many Democrats have caught wind that it’s not going to be pretty when that rolls around.

Rep. Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island becomes the fourth member of the House of Representatives to announce over the past three days that they’ll retire at the end of the year rather than run for re-election.

As things currently  stand, eight House Democrats have announced retirement with another five running for state offices. Now, the Democrats will be defending 13 open seats in the midterm elections. More Democrat vacancies are expected to follow.

Rep. Patrick Kennedy

Rep. Patrick Kennedy

Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee said that many of the House Democratic retirements were occurring in some tough political territory, adding that “the fact of the matter is, Democrats in swing districts are retiring because they know what November has in store for them.”

We all know why things are going down like this; the question is, how are the conservatives going to capitalize on this?

Unipartisan Politics

By Concerned Conservative on February 10, 2010

Last week, the president met with Republican leaders in an attempt to put aside partisanship for the good of the nation.

Last Weeks Bipartisan Meeting

Their goals included job creation and some other issues that needed to be taken care of somewhere between several months and over a year ago.

It didn’t really work.

“We can’t afford to allow politics to stand in the way of a well-functioning government,” the president said.

Does he know what a well-functioning government looks like? Please consider Ronald Reagan’s presidency.

Maybe Obama will eventually realize that promising bipartisanship and then voting for your guy without compromise is considered hypocrisy.

Compare it to your marriage all you like, Mr. President, this is not bipartisanship. And it’s not for the benefit of the nation.

The President Senses Discord

By Concerned Conservative on February 8, 2010

Obama’s pretty sure that something is wrong. . . . “There is a sense that something is different now, that something’s broken, that those of us in Washington are not serving the people as well as we should. At times it seems like we’re unable to listen to one another, to have at once a serious and civil debate.”

Yeah. We’ve noticed. Who hasn’t noticed? The Democrats are so giddy with their congressional majority that they haven’t stopped arguing amongst themselves long enough to do any good for our nation.

Speaking at the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C. the president said this “erosion of civility” sows division and distrust.

I say that the Democrats need to get over their favorable party position and remember the millions of Americans they serve. Watching on the news as our government functions  shouldn’t be so scandalous an experience; the republic aspect of our government requires them to vote as their constituents would vote.

The argument would become a lull if congressional representatives would apply this principle in their practice. Who knows what would happen if Washington’s leaders could stop arguing long enough to speak nicely about something important?

Whats not to argue with?

What's not to argue with?

President Held Accountable by the People to the People

By Concerned Conservative on February 2, 2010

During the past six days,  55,340 people asked 11,695 questions to President Barack Obama on YouTube. Voters then cast 643,507 votes to determine the top questions YouTube asked Obama Monday at the White House in an unprecedented live interview streamed on YouTube.com/CitizenTube.

President Obama had no idea what he’ll be asked (well, sort of. Obviously we all had a long list of unanswered questions after last week). I imagine that had he addressed real issues during last week’s State of the Union Address, he wouldn’t have had reason to be nervous.

  • “Why are the health care meetings, procedures, etc not on CSPAN as promised?” – Mr. Anderson, Texas
  • “How do you expect the people of this country to trust you when you have repeatedly broken promises that were made on the campaign trail. Most recently, the promise to have a transparent healthcare debate…” – Warren Hunter, Brooklyn

Sure, there were a few frivolous and personal questions, but YouTube viewers, like the rest of America, had a few questions for our commander in chief.  Steve Grove, who heads News and Politics on YouTube, notes that new mediums like the online video site promise to improve the “transparency and direct access” to politics.

The “pulse” of the nation can be revealed in this type of open question-answer session– we can now respond directly to the President’s televised speech of last week. This development in communication between the President and the People cannot be anything but beneficial.

New mediums seek to keep the government for the people by the people

New mediums seek to keep the government for the people by the people.